Monday, May 7, 2007

You say potato and I say po-tah-to

I noticed something odd in the May installment of OFAC's monthly enforcement update. Normally, each enforcement action ends with a statement that indicates whether or not the violation was voluntarily disclosed to OFAC. A violation that was not voluntarily disclosed normally reads as follows:

[Company Name] did not voluntarily disclose this matter to OFAC.

However, this month there was a case involving Fleet National Bank and Suretrade and it concluded with this statement:

This matter was not the subject of a voluntary disclosure to OFAC.

Is this an intentional distinction? And if so, what the heck does it mean?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I think it may be that the "not the subject of" a voluntary disclosure suggests that a voluntary disclosure was made about other things and that in the course of reviewing those things, OFAC discovered other violations. Just a guess.

It could also just be "special agent" speak which always adds unnecessary verbiage. For example, the perp doesn't just "make a wire transfer to Iran" but instead "makes and causes a fund transfer aka a wire transfer of what were believed to be funds and which were destined to a recipient in Iran."